So, is anyone here even on the same page? How can it be done? Why does something that simple have to be SO HARD? However, at this point I'm pretty sure that that's not the way to go about it either. Then I turned to astrophotography software, namely DeepSkyStacker. I've been banging my head against the wall in Photoshop for a long time and eventually came to a conclusion that PS is not the answer, unless there's a plugin. Take 8 underexposed pictures, let the camera merge them and voila! Almost like magic. An example:ġ exposure (regular mode): 8 seconds f-5.6 = equals proper exposure of the sceneĨ exposures (multiple-exposure mode), each exposure is: 1 second f.5.6 = equals proper exposure of the sceneīoth results are nearly identical out of the camera and the technique is very simple. I am not looking for a way to introduce elements that are not present in all of the pictures (that make up the final result).
Rawtherapee hdr software#
Why can't I take, let's say 8 separate pictures and use some kind of software to replicate the result I would otherwise get right out of the camera, with the obvious advantage of being able to align the images on a sub-pixel level? And I need to clarify. Otherwise, it would have been a very useful tool. How about multiple exposures? Yes, there's a multiple-exposure mode in my camera (Nikon D800) but it limits the number of exposures to 10 and there can be no alignment of the images whatsoever. We all know that using HDR software to merge a bracketed sequence of images is just so much better than switching the camera into HDR and letting it do the work right there on the spot.
0 kommentar(er)
